Articles

The full text of articles is available to Adjudication Society members only. If you are a member, please log in if you have not already done so. If you would like to join the Society, click here.

Displaying 441 - 460 of 492
We are pleased to send you the last Newsletter of 2003. We again have some int [and quarterly thereafter] and we should have a comprehensive case summary then, but cases are also on the website as well as articles etc. Grateful thanks to our many contributors during the years.
At last month’s Annual Meeting the management of the Adjudication Society was passed to an elected committee.

Ian Drummond of Burness & Co, Edinburgh comments in more detail on a recent Court of Session Decision on Adjudicators Reasons

CONSTRUCTION ADJUDICATION

THE GIVING OF REASONS BY ADJUDICATORS

Statutory Adjudication – A Practical Guide by Derek Simmonds C Eng, BSc, FICE, FCIArb, FCMI, FConsE, published by Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 1-4051-1085-6, 266 pages including Appendices.

We are pleased to send you the August 2003 Newsletter with full details of the Second Annual Conference and details of the proposed constitution etc. We again have some interesting thoughts on the adjudication process and also some very interesting case produced by Nick Gould. Have you looked at our website which is crammed with very useful articles and commentaries.

The Editor interviews the construction team of DLA in their superb new Edinburgh office, on a number of issues. Many thanks to Fenella Mason and her team in the Scottish practice of DLA's Construction and Engineering Group for their assistance.

The Editor interviews the construction team of DLA in their superb new Edinburgh office, on a number of issues. Many thanks to Fenella Mason and her team in the Scottish practice of DLA's Construction and Engineering Group for their assistance.

The Midlands region held a successful re-launch meeting on 25 June at the Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The meeting was attended by about 50 people.

Apologies to all our readers for the long delay in issuing further Newsletters.

All rumours of the Editor going walkabout in Australia are unfounded – simply a long involvement in a dispute had meant my attention was fully occupied elsewhere for a number of months.

A sub-contractor's recovery of acceleration costs has added to the options open to contractors in delay. The court's judgment in Motherwell Bridge Construction Limited –v- Micafil (November 2002, TCC) was issued without much comment, but heralds an important new approach by the courts.

This month sees another bumper issue mainly due to the comprehensive Case Law Corner by Nick Gould. Many thanks to all of our contributors, and this includes an interesting debate on a proposition from John Sims. Readers are invited to comment on any aspect of the Newsletter.
Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling : “Subject: A proposition for the newsletter

Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling :

“Subject: A proposition for the newsletter

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000167 EndHTML:0000037583 StartFragment:0000000454 EndFragment:0000037567

Alan McAleer, a very experienced consultant kindly submitted his views on a number of issues.

 

The question put to members by the Editor by e mail) was :

This issue sees the first of our quarterly Society Newsletters. Further issues will appear in April, July and October. Again we are grateful, in this issue, to a number of contributors as we try to cover new ground, and issues, emerging from the world of dispute resolution.

John Redmond ( a great contributor to the Newsletter) of Osborne Clark, Solicitors,
responded to the Editors views “that Arbitration can learn much from Adjudication”.
“ARBICATION?

Problems with Adjudication in the UK

The view of the RICS on the question of change to the legislation governing construction adjudication is that it is largely unnecessary and unlikely.