Articles

Articles in the May 2003 Newsletter

Displaying 6 items

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000167 EndHTML:0000037583 StartFragment:0000000454 EndFragment:0000037567

Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling :

“Subject: A proposition for the newsletter

Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling : “Subject: A proposition for the newsletter
This month sees another bumper issue mainly due to the comprehensive Case Law Corner by Nick Gould. Many thanks to all of our contributors, and this includes an interesting debate on a proposition from John Sims. Readers are invited to comment on any aspect of the Newsletter.

A sub-contractor's recovery of acceleration costs has added to the options open to contractors in delay. The court's judgment in Motherwell Bridge Construction Limited –v- Micafil (November 2002, TCC) was issued without much comment, but heralds an important new approach by the courts.

Alan McAleer, a very experienced consultant kindly submitted his views on a number of issues.